Corporate Responses to Food, Inc.

Sean helpfully e-mailed me this link to Monsanto’s website, on which they rebut some of the charges leveled at them in Food, Inc. It’s pretty interesting to see what they respond to and what they don’t, and to see their own arguments for doing what they do. The website opens with an image whose text reads, “To feed the growing populations agricultural systems need to work together to bring about a sustainable solution to world hunger.”

If you can find other responses to the arguments in Food, Inc., please pass them along to me via e-mail.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Mystery Meat, Solved

So, I was trying to figure out what “hamburger meat filler” meant when we were watching Food Inc., and I have a reliable source. It’s actually in a story that was in the New York Times only a few weeks ago:

With the U.S.D.A.’s stamp of approval, the company’s processed beef has become a mainstay in America’s hamburgers. McDonald’s, Burger King and other fast-food giants use it as a component in ground beef, as do grocery chains. The federal school lunch program used an estimated 5.5 million pounds of the processed beef last year alone.

Some sources I’ve seen say it’s in 70% of burgers sold in the US (especially fast food and school lunches), but I haven’t been able to confirm that number yet. Why use it in school lunches?

Despite some misgivings, school lunch officials say they use Beef Products because its price is substantially lower than ordinary meat trimmings, saving about $1 million a year.

Yikes. Here’s one bit of the Times story that jumped out at me, though:

Carl S. Custer, a former U.S.D.A. microbiologist, said he and other scientists were concerned that the department had approved the treated beef for sale without obtaining independent validation of the potential safety risk. Another department microbiologist, Gerald Zirnstein, called the processed beef “pink slime” in a 2002 e-mail message to colleagues and said, “I do not consider the stuff to be ground beef, and I consider allowing it in ground beef to be a form of fraudulent labeling.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Today’s Assignment – Jan. 25

Today you can work on your blogs. We’ll continue to talk about essays connected to food when I return this week. Along those lines, if you’re interested in using this as a prompt for one of your blog posts this week, be my guest. Three words: print your food.

If you tire of working on your blogs, be sure you spend some time reading your workshop partners’ essays carefully. Tuesday and Wednesday of this week will be your final workshop days for this essay.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

More Debates

Yesterday, I asked you to read and respond to arguments about the AP curriculum in schools. Today, I’m giving you the choice of several debates, all in the Times’ “Room for Debate” series. I encourage you to read as many of them as you can, but I want you to choose just one of them to analyze closely in your reading notebook. You might also consider offering your own opinions on the subjects; do that on your blog, not in your reading notebook.

A reminder: READ THE WHOLE THING. Each author’s argument is cut off after a few paragraphs, with a “read more” link. Make sure you always click on that link for each author.

Here they are:
The Truth about Santa
The Economics of Eating Well
What’s Missing in Airport Security?
Does Tiger Woods Have a Right to Privacy?
What Should High Schools Do About Concussions Among Student Athletes?

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Hey Folks

Well, a little change of plans heading into 2010. Jen had the baby a little early, and we’re all settled in at home. But as I said before break, I’ll be taking paternity leave a few days at a time. Starting now.

So I’m going to give you some things to read and write about, keeping with our argument and persuasion unit. We’re starting with something close to home. I ran into this debate over at the New York Times website last week. It’s entitled “The Advanced Placement Juggernaut.” Read the arguments by all six authors, and analyze those arguments in a two-to-three-page reading notebook entry. Take note of the authors’ claims, what kind of evidence is used, who the arguments seem aimed at, and which you find most effective.

Start getting to work on your second essay as well. I’d like to see those first drafts (drumroll…) on Monday when you come in. We’ll talk about it when I get back…

Oh, and start blogging again. Happy New Year!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Quick Overview of the Week

Monday/Tuesday: A discussion of the Paris episode of Anthony Bourdain’s No Reservations; R. Crumb’s “A Short History of America”

Wednesday: N. Perrin’s “Forever Virgin”; short excerpt from R. Carson’s “Silent Spring”

Thursday: Blogging

Friday: TBA

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“MyLife 24-7” Contests

MyLife 24-7 is running two contests that might be of interest to AP Lang and Perspectives students. The first is a blogging contest: the winner gets an iPod Nano and a biweekly column on the MyLife website. The second is a video contest: the winnner gets a Flip Ultra video camera and an award presented by MyLife 24-7.

Want more info? Follow the links…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Fall Portfolio

The requirements are uploaded for you. We’ll talk about them in class.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Presentation Rubric

If you’d like to see the rubric I’ll be using to grade you, click on the “Fall Assignments” tab up top.

Or just click here. Either way.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Annotated Bibliographies

Here’s the short version, which I’ll elaborate on in class.

For your fall Author Study, I want you to include an annotated bibliography. An explanation of what that is, including a brief example, can be found here. For this assignment, I’m asking for between 1-2 thorough paragraphs that explains how much you read of that particular book, what you got out of it, etc.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment